Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial
Yet another combination to consider after CDK4/6i + ET in HR+ MBC!
Eliminating breast surgery for invasive breast cancer in exceptional responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial
Author(s): Prof Yu Shen, PhD6; Heather Lin, PhD6; Prof Anthony Lucci, MD1; Prof Judy C Boughey, MD7; Prof Richard L White, MD8; Prof Emilia J Diego, MD9; Prof Gaiane M Rauch, MD4; on behalf of theExceptional Responders Clinical Trials Group
Source: DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00613-1
Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts
A small study but seems promising, for some patients surgery may not be needed after neoadjuvant therapy ( Triple negative and HER-2 neu positive). Colorectal surgeons in Orlando are avoiding surgery in some pts who respond to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Need more trials though.
BACKGROUND
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer yields a pathological complete response in approximately 60% of patients. A pathological complete response to NST predicts an excellent prognosis and can be accurately determined by percutaneous image-guided vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB). We evaluated radiotherapy alone, without breast surgery, in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with NST who had an image-guided VACB-determined pathological complete response.
METHODS
This multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial was done in seven centres in the USA. Women aged 40 years or older who were not pregnant with unicentric cT1–2N0–1M0 triple-negative breast cancer or HER2-positive breast cancer and a residual breast lesion less than 2 cm on imaging after clinically standard NST were eligible for inclusion. Patients had one biopsy (minimum of 12 cores) obtained by 9G image-guided VACB of the tumour bed. If no invasive or in-situ disease was identified, breast surgery was omitted, and patients underwent standard whole-breast radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 fractions or 50 Gy in 25 fractions) plus a boost (14 Gy in seven fractions). The primary outcome was the biopsy-confirmed ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence rate determined using the Kaplan-Meier method assessed in the per-protocol population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received VACB. This study has completed accrual and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02945579.
FINDINGS
Between March 6, 2017, and Nov 9, 2021, 58 patients consented to participate; however, four (7%) did not meet final inclusion criteria and four (7%) withdrew consent. 50 patients were enrolled and underwent VACB following NST. The median age of the enrolled patients was 62 years (IQR 55–77); 21 (42%) patients had triple-negative breast cancer and 29 (58%) had HER2-positive breast cancer. VACB identified a pathological complete response in 31 patients (62% [95% CI 47·2–75·4). At a median follow-up of 26·4 months (IQR 15·2–39·6), no ipsilateral breast tumour recurrences occurred in these 31 patients. No serious biopsy-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred.
INTERPRETATION
Eliminating breast surgery in highly selected patients with an image-guided VACB-determined pathological complete response following NST is feasible with promising early results; however, additional prospective clinical trials evaluating this approach are needed.
Author Affiliations
1Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 2Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 3Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 4Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 5Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 6Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 7Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA 8Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA 9Division of Breast Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USARelated Articles
Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer — Primary Results of the INSEMA Trial
The INSEMA trial showed that for early stage, T1-T2 clinically node negative breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsies should not be mandatory, and best clinical judgement can be used.
Imlunestrant with or without Abemaciclib in Advanced Breast Cancer
Imlunestrant (novel oral SERD) was active in patients with an ESR1 mutations, but otherwise did not offer a benefit in this population of women with ER+ HER2-neg MBC. Overall survival (OS) data is pending with further follow up.
Camrelizumab vs Placebo in Combination With Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Early or Locally Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Another trial with neoadjuvant immunotherapy showing improved results over chemotherapy alone. (12% higher PCR 48% vs 36%).
Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer: Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01
Dato-DXd is now approved in HR+, HER2-neg, metastatic breast cancer after prior therapy with endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy. There was an impressive reduction in the risk of death or progression with an HR of 0.63. Watch out for ocular and pulmonary toxicity. HER2-ultra low testing will be burdensome but must be done for drug approval.
