MRD status in MM has unquestionable prognostic informational value, however many questions remain as how to address positive / negative MRD results. Should we de-escalate or stop Rx? When? Can we escalate Rx if + MRD? Which regimen, how long? It will be another few years till objective data are available. I do see value in at least having identification of clonality established upfront for tracking.
We explored minimal residual disease (MRD) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and transplant-ineligible (TIE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) using data from 4 phase 3 studies (POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA). Each study previously demonstrated that daratumumab-based therapies improved MRD negativity rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by approximately half vs standards of care. We conducted a large-scale pooled analysis for associations between patients achieving complete response or better (≥CR) with MRD-negative status and progression-free survival (PFS). MRD was assessed via next-generation sequencing (10−5 sensitivity threshold). Patient-level data were pooled from all 4 studies and for patients with TIE NDMM and patients with RRMM who received ≤2 prior lines of therapy (≤2 PL). PFS was evaluated by response and MRD status. Median follow-up (months) was 54.8 for POLLUX, 50.2 for CASTOR, 40.1 for ALCYONE, and 36.4 for MAIA. Patients who achieved ≥CR and MRD negativity had improved PFS vs those who failed to reach CR or were MRD positive (TIE NDMM and RRMM hazard ratio [HR] 0.20, P < .0001; TIE NDMM and RRMM ≤2 PL HR 0.20, P < .0001). This benefit occurred irrespective of therapy or disease setting. A time-varying Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that ≥CR with MRD negativity was associated with improved PFS. Daratumumab-based treatment was associated with more patients reaching ≥CR and MRD negativity. These findings represent the first large-scale analysis with robust methodology to support ≥CR with MRD negativity as a prognostic factor for PFS in RRMM and TIE NDMM. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02076009, #NCT02136134, #NCT02195479, and #NCT02252172.
Direct comparison of Dara+len vs. len maintenance for those with +MMR after Auto-HSCT. MRD-neg conversion rates were higher in the combo arm. This is likely going to continue gaining traction in this group of patients.
Retrospective assessment of the SWOG0777 and SWOG 1211 studies showing that dose reductions in dexamethasone did not affect outcomes. Nice to see this does not have a negative impact, as I have been doing this for years in my elderly patients who would not tolerate the ultra-high dose steroids used in these trials.
MRD at year 1 can be prognostic in pt who had AutoBMT followed by maintenance linolidomide. Please use MRD wisely … it can be expensive.
First line regimen, first quad for transplant INELIGIBLE patients, PFS at 5 years is 63% vs 45% for RVD. This will probably be the new standard of care for this population with manageable toxicity. Recall Dara RVD is for transplant eligible patients.
This regimen vs pomalidomie, bortezomib and dexma. 12-month estimated progression-free survival with BPd was 71% compared with 51% with PVd (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52) Ocular toxicity Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 94% of the patients in the BPd group and 76% of those in the PVd group.
FCS Hematology Oncology Review creates a platform for our physician network to observe the most recent articles and studies available in the oncology and hematology world. By sharing these articles we are building our wealth of knowledge of new observations and treatments as they come available.
