PACE: A Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant, Palbociclib, and Avelumab After Progression on Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor and Aromatase Inhibitor for Hormone Receptor–Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Author(s): Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH1,2, Yue Ren, MS3, Nikhil Wagle, MD1,2, Reshma Mahtani, DO4, Cynthia Ma, MD, PhD5, Angela DeMichele, MD, MSCE6, Massimo Cristofanilli, MD7, Jane Meisel, MD8, Kathy D. Miller, MD9, Yara Abdou, MD10, Elizabeth C. Riley, MD11, Rubina Qamar, MD12, Priyanka Sharma, MD13, Sonya Reid, MD, MPH14, Natalie Sinclair, MD1, Meredith Faggen, MD1, Caroline C. Block, MD1,2, Naomi Ko, MD15, Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH1,2, Wendy Y. Chen, MD, MPH1,2, Michelle DeMeo, BS1, Victoria Attaya, BA1, Amanda Okpoebo, MS1, Jillian Alberti, MS1, Yuan Liu, PhD16, Eric Gauthier, PhD, PharmD16, Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD1,2, Meredith M. Regan, ScD2,3, Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH1,2
Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01940

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Findings from the PACE study show that the addition of Palbociclib to Fulvestrant was not better than Fulvestrant alone, and the addition of Avelumab to Fulvestrant improved and nearly doubled the PFS. This is compelling and should be studied further for our patients with HR+ HER2- MBC.

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are an important component of treatment for hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but it is not known if patients might derive benefit from continuation of CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy beyond initial tumor progression or if the addition of checkpoint inhibitor therapy has value in this setting.

METHODS

The randomized multicenter phase II PACE trial enrolled patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2– MBC whose disease had progressed on previous CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:2:1 to receive fulvestrant (F), fulvestrant plus palbociclib (F + P), or fulvestrant plus palbociclib and avelumab (F + P + A). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with F versus F + P.

RESULTS

Overall, 220 patients were randomly assigned between September 2017 and February 2022. The median age was 57 years (range, 25-83 years). Most patients were postmenopausal (80.9%), and 40% were originally diagnosed with de novo MBC. Palbociclib was the most common previous CDK4/6i (90.9%). The median PFS was 4.8 months on F and 4.6 months on F + P (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [90% CI, 0.79 to 1.55]; P = .62). The median PFS on F + P + A was 8.1 months (HR v F, 0.75 [90% CI, 0.50 to 1.12]; P = .23). The difference in PFS with F + P and F + P + A versus F was greater among patients with baseline ESR1 and PIK3CA alterations.

CONCLUSION

The addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant did not improve PFS versus fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2– MBC whose disease had progressed on a previous CDK4/6i plus AI. The increased PFS seen with the addition of avelumab warrants further investigation in this patient population.

Author Affiliations

1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 4Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, 5Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 6Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 7Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 8Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 9Hematology/Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 10Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 11Department of Medicine, Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, KY, 12Aurora Cancer Care, Milwaukee, WI, 13Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, 14Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 15Department of Medical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 16Pfizer, La Jolla, CA

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Donepezil for Treatment of Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Survivors After Adjuvant Chemotherapy (WF-97116)

It seems donepezil did not show any cognitive benefit when added to standard adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Unfortunately, adequate treatment for ‘chemo-brain’ remains elusive. There is data that a lipid structure, S1P, may be linked to this process and may be ‘druggable’ with some of the MS agents.

Read More »

Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Advanced or Metastatic HR+/HER2– and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Results From the Phase I TROPION-PanTumor01 Study

Datopotamab Deruxtecan is a new ADC that will likely be approved in the near future. The payload is the same as used in Enhertu, but the antibody is directed at TROP2. This report is from the TROPION-pan tumor study and shows a promising ORR in HR+/HER2- MBC. There is reasonable data for this compound in 2L met-NSCLC in the TROPION-LUNG01 study with an improvement in PFS compared to docetaxel of 4.4 vs 3.7 months. Dato also is effective in patients with actionable genetic alterations in the 2L setting. There is also an ongoing study on its use in the 1L setting for met-NSCLC in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy.

Read More »

Final results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy vs combination chemotherapy in premenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer

Nicely done study comparing Ribociclib + ET vs chemotherapy in premenopausal high-risk HR+, HER2-neg patients felt to be high risk. Results showed better efficacy (PFS), tolerability and similar response rates. Of note, >80% of patients had visceral disease or were felt to be rapid progressors. Anti-hormone-based therapy remains king in the HR+ setting.

Read More »