Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer: Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01

Author(s): Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH1,2; Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP3,4; Seock-Ah Im, MD, PhD5; Sonia Pernas, MD, PhD6; Michelino De Laurentiis, MD7; Shusen Wang, MD8; Noelia Martínez Jañez, MD, PhD9; Giuliano Borges, MD10; David W. Cescon, MD, PhD11; Masaya Hattori, MD12; Yen-Shen Lu, MD, PhD13; Erika Hamilton, MD14; Qingyuan Zhang, MD, PhD15; Junji Tsurutani, MD, PhD16; Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS17; Pedro Emanuel Rubini Liedke, MD18,19,20; Lu Xu, PhD21; Rick M. Fairhurst, MD, PhD21; Sabrina Khan, MD, MPH21; Neelima Denduluri, MD21; Hope S. Rugo, MD22; Binghe Xu, MD, PhD23; Barbara Pistilli, MD24;
Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00920

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Dato-DXd is now approved in HR+, HER2-neg, metastatic breast cancer after prior therapy with endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy. There was an impressive reduction in the risk of death or progression with an HR of 0.63. Watch out for ocular and pulmonary toxicity. HER2-ultra low testing will be burdensome but must be done for drug approval.

PURPOSE

The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2–directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2–) breast cancer.

METHODS

Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n = 365) or ICC (n = 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.

Author Affiliations

1Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; 3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; 4Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; 5Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 6Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; 7Istituto Nazionale Tumori Napoli IRCCS “Fondazione Pascale”, Napoli, Italy; 8Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; 9Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; 10Catarina Pesquisa Clínica, Santa Catarina, Brazil; 11Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada; 12Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan; 13National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; 14Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; 15Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China; 16Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan; 17Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA; 18Hospital das Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil; 19UPCO—Pesquisa Clinica em Oncologia, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 20Oncoclinicas Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 21AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD; 22University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; 23National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; 24Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France;

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Overall Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

This study confirms what we saw in initial reports showing the addition of pembro increasing the rate of ypathological complete response (ypCR’s) in the neoadjuvant setting for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). New data shows a 5% improvement (87 vs 82%) in overall survival (OS) with the quadruplet. Higher gains but at higher cost of toxicity. The fact that adjuvant intraosseous (IO) does not seem to improve outcomes, but neoadjuvant chemo+IO does show intact tumor-immune interactions to create maximum treatment effectiveness is most likely real. Of note, this seems mostly independent of programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) status.

Read More »