Updated Overall Survival and Exploratory Analysis From Randomized, Phase II EVAN Study of Erlotinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Adjuvant Therapy in Stage IIIA Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor+ Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Author(s): Dongsheng Yue, MD1; Shidong Xu, MD2; Qun Wang, MD3; Xiaofei Li, MD4; Yi Shen, MD5; Heng Zhao, MD6; Chun Chen, MD7; Weimin Mao, MD8; Wei Liu, MD9; Junfeng Liu, MD10; Lanjun Zhang, MD11; Haitao Ma, MD12; Qiang Li, MD13; Yue Yang, MD14; Yongyu Liu, MD15; Haiquan Chen, MD16; Zhenfa Zhang, MD1; Bin Zhang, MD1; Changli Wang, MD1
Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00428 Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 34 (December 01, 2022) 3912-3917.
Original Article
Professional photo of Maem Hussein, MD

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Another EGFR inhibitor beating chemotherapy in EGFR mutated NSCLC in the adjuvant setting.
The randomized, open-label, phase II EVAN study investigated the efficacy (disease-free survival [DFS] and 5-year overall survival [OS]) and safety of erlotinib versus vinorelbine/cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection (R0) for stage III epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation+ non–small-cell lung cancer. We describe the updated results at the 43-month follow-up. In EVAN, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to erlotinib (n = 51) or vinorelbine/cisplatin (n = 51). The median follow-up was 54.8 and 63.9 months in the erlotinib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. With erlotinib, the respective 5-year DFS by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 48.2% (95% CI, 29.4 to 64.7) and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.6 to 62.9) in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The median OS was 84.2 months with erlotinib versus 61.1 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.151 to 0.670). The 5-year survival rates were 84.8% and 51.1% with erlotinib and chemotherapy, respectively. In whole-exome sequencing analysis, frequent genes with variants co-occurring at baseline were TP53, MUC16, FAM104B, KMT5A, and DNAH9. With erlotinib, a single-nucleotide polymorphism mutation in UBXN11 was associated with significantly worse DFS (P = .01). To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS improvement with adjuvant erlotinib compared with chemotherapy in R0 stage III EGFR+ non–small-cell lung cancer.

Author Affiliations

1Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China 2Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China 3Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China 4Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China 5The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China 6Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Chest Hospital, Shanghai, China 7Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China 8Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China 9Jilin University First Hospital, Changchun, China 10Hebei Cancer Institute, Shijiazhuang, China 11Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China 12First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China 13Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chengdu, China 14Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China 15Liaoning Cancer Institute and Hospital, Shenyang, China 16Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in Atypical EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From CHRYSALIS-2

The CHRYSALIS-2, the cohort C analysis of patients with atypical EGFR mutations showed meaningful and durable activity. Atypical mutations can be difficult to deal with as a clinician, and having concrete data on these (S768I, L861Q and G719ZX) mutations gives assurance that this doublet is active. Overall response rate (ORR) was 52% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 months in refractory patients and 19.5 months in the treatment-naive population.

Read More »

Updated Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II PHAROS Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

This update demonstrated that encorafenib plus binimetinib was associated with the longest median overall survival (mOS) reported to date among targeted therapies in patients with treatment-naïve BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Median OS was 47.6 months in treatment-naïve patients. By the way check the authors there 😊.

Read More »

Simultaneous Durvalumab and Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III PACIFIC-2 Study

PACIFIC-2 was a phase III trial testing durva given concurrently with cCRT (and continued as consolidation) versus placebo + cCRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC, and it did not meet its primary endpoint. The overall response rate (ORR) was essentially identical (60.7% vs 60.6%), and pneumonitis rates were similar (any grade 28.8% vs 28.7%; grade ≥3: 4.6% vs 5.6%), but adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation and fatal AEs were higher with durva (25.6% vs 12.0%; 13.7% vs 10.2%), especially early on. Starting IO up front with cCRT didn’t improve outcomes and added early toxicity—consolidation durva after cCRT is still the way to go.

Read More »

Sevabertinib in Advanced HER2-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Sevabertinib shows strong efficacy in HER2-mutant NSCLC, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 64% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.3 months in previously treated, HER2-TKI–naive patients, and an overall response rate (ORR) of 71% with a duration of response (DOR) of 11.0 months in first-line therapy. Activity is highest in TKD mutations, especially Y772_A775dupYVMA, and intracranial responses are seen. Safety is manageable: diarrhea is common but mostly low grade, with grade ≥3 in 5–23% and rare discontinuations. Notably, interstitial lung disease (ILD) was not observed. These data position sevabertinib as a viable oral TKI alongside ADCs for HER2-mutant NSCLC, particularly for TKD/YVMA disease.

Read More »
Load More