First-in-Human Phase I/IB Dose-Finding Study of Adagrasib (MRTX849) in Patients With Advanced KRASG12C Solid Tumors (KRYSTAL-1)

Author(s): Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, MD, PhD¹; Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD²; Ticiana A. Leal, MD³; Igor I. Rybkin, MD, PhD⁴; Joshua K. Sabari, MD, PhD⁵; Minal A. Barve, MD⁶

Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02752 Journal of Clinical Oncology Published online February 15, 2022. PMID: 35167329

Dr. Lucio Gordan's Thoughts

This is an important progress for patients with KRASG12C mutation. Median PFS of 11 months is very encouraging for a previously “undruggable” molecular signature.

PURPOSE

Adagrasib (MRTX849) is an oral, highly selective, small-molecule, covalent inhibitor of KRAS^G12C. We report results from a phase I/IB study of adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and other solid tumors harboring the KRAS^G12C mutation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced KRAS^G12C-mutant solid tumors were treated with adagrasib 150 mg orally once daily, 300 mg once daily, 600 mg once daily, 1,200 mg once daily, or 600 mg orally twice a day using an accelerated titration design, which transitioned to a modified toxicity probability interval design when a predefined degree of toxicity was observed or target adagrasib exposure was achieved. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of adagrasib. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 600 mg twice a day on the basis of safety, tolerability, and observed pharmacokinetics properties. No maximum tolerated dose was formally defined. After a median follow-up of 19.6 months, eight of 15 patients (53.3%; 95% CI, 26.6 to 78.7) with RECIST-evaluable KRAS^G12C-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer treated at 600 mg twice a day achieved a confirmed partial response. The median duration of response was 16.4 months (95% CI, 3.1 to not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI, 2.6 to not estimable). One of two patients with KRAS^G12C-mutant colorectal cancer treated at 600 mg twice a day achieved a partial response (duration of response, 4.2 months). At the RP2D, the most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) were nausea (80.0%), diarrhea (70.0%), vomiting (50.0%), and fatigue (45.0%). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was fatigue (15.0%).

CONCLUSION

Adagrasib 600 mg twice a day was well tolerated and exhibited antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring the KRAS^G12C mutation.

Author Affiliations

¹University of California Irvine School of Medicine and Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA ²Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ³University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI ⁴Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI ⁵Perlmutter Cancer Center New York University Langone Health, New York, NY ⁶Mary Crowley Cancer Center, Dallas, TX ⁷University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA ⁸Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN ⁹Mirati Therapeutics, Inc, San Diego, CA ¹⁰START San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

Neoadjuvant PD-1 and PD-L1 Blockade With Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The phase II trial of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy in borderline resectable and unresectable stage III NSCLC showed a significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS) with the combination (24.1 vs 10.6 months) compared to chemotherapy alone, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.62. Major pathological response rates were higher with immunotherapy (44.7% vs 22.3%), and no new safety signals were noted. The regimen improved surgical resection rates (68% vs 52%) without increasing perioperative complications. This validates chemoIO in the neoadjuvant setting particularly in whom we wish to pursue resection or avoid chemoradiation. It would be great to see this compared to chemoradiation followed by immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy alone.

Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer

The BREAKWATER trial evaluated encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 as a first-line therapy for BRAF V600E–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, showing very significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) (12.8 vs 7.1mos) and overall survival (OS) (30.3 vs 15.1mos). The combo also achieved a higher overall response rate (ORR). (60 vs 40%), positioning it as a new standard for this challenging patient population. Of note, side effects like nausea, diarrhea, and neuropathy, which were more frequent with this regimen. I would use this in the appropriate patient.

Effect of invitation to colonoscopy versus faecal immunochemical test screening on colorectal cancer mortality (COLONPREV): a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

People prefer stool card over colonoscopy, and it is not inferior.

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer

Results showed the median event-free survival (EFS) was 54.8 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 20.9 months with chemotherapy. Three-year EFS rates were 56% vs 44%. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates were 73% vs 61% pathologic complete response rates were 20.4% vs 4.6%. This was three cycles of nivolumab and one dose of ipilimumab vs chemotherapy.

Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Genomic Alterations: Results From the Phase II TROPION-Lung05 Study

Dato showed a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 42.7% with a complete response (CR) of 4.3%. The median duration of response was 7.0 months, with a disease control rate of 86.3% and a median overall survival (OS) of 15.6 months. This could be another option for EGFR mutant patients who had multiple lines of therapy.