Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer: Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01

Author(s): Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH1,2; Komal Jhaveri, MD, FACP3,4; Seock-Ah Im, MD, PhD5; Sonia Pernas, MD, PhD6; Michelino De Laurentiis, MD7; Shusen Wang, MD8; Noelia Martínez Jañez, MD, PhD9; Giuliano Borges, MD10; David W. Cescon, MD, PhD11; Masaya Hattori, MD12; Yen-Shen Lu, MD, PhD13; Erika Hamilton, MD14; Qingyuan Zhang, MD, PhD15; Junji Tsurutani, MD, PhD16; Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS17; Pedro Emanuel Rubini Liedke, MD18,19,20; Lu Xu, PhD21; Rick M. Fairhurst, MD, PhD21; Sabrina Khan, MD, MPH21; Neelima Denduluri, MD21; Hope S. Rugo, MD22; Binghe Xu, MD, PhD23; Barbara Pistilli, MD24;
Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00920

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Dato-DXd is now approved in HR+, HER2-neg, metastatic breast cancer after prior therapy with endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy. There was an impressive reduction in the risk of death or progression with an HR of 0.63. Watch out for ocular and pulmonary toxicity. HER2-ultra low testing will be burdensome but must be done for drug approval.

PURPOSE

The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2–directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2–) breast cancer.

METHODS

Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n = 365) or ICC (n = 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.

Author Affiliations

1Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; 3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; 4Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; 5Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 6Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; 7Istituto Nazionale Tumori Napoli IRCCS “Fondazione Pascale”, Napoli, Italy; 8Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; 9Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; 10Catarina Pesquisa Clínica, Santa Catarina, Brazil; 11Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada; 12Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan; 13National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; 14Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; 15Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China; 16Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan; 17Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA; 18Hospital das Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil; 19UPCO—Pesquisa Clinica em Oncologia, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 20Oncoclinicas Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 21AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD; 22University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; 23National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; 24Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France;

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles