Pooled data of nearly 2000 patients across six trials in melanoma using IO therapy. It seems clear that high dose corticosteroid use was associated with worse outcomes, especially with high peak doses. What may be worth considering is if non-steroid based immunosuppression can be used as an adjunct to blunt this concerning effect.
Retrospective studies suggest that immunosuppressive treatment of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) impairs survival in patients with melanoma who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we study this association across tumor types using data from six international phase II/III registrational trials.
A post hoc analysis was performed on individual patient data from the anti–programmed cell death-1 (anti–PD-1) + anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein-4 (anti–CTLA-4) treatment arms of six clinical trials (CheckMate-067, -142, -214, -648, -743, and -9LA). Among patients who received systemic immunosuppression for treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), associations of peak and cumulative corticosteroid dose, and use of second-line immunosuppression with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using multilevel Cox regression with adjustment for age and sex.
Of the 1,959 patients who received anti–PD-1 + anti–CTLA-4 therapy, 834 patients who were treated with immunosuppression for trAEs were included. Eight hundred and thirty-two patients (100%) received corticosteroids and 81 patients (10%) received second-line immunosuppressants. High corticosteroid peak dose was associated with worse PFS: adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.29) for 1 versus 0.5 mg/kg prednisolone and HRadj, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.96) for 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg. Similar effects were observed for OS: HRadj, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.39) and HRadj, 1.66 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.37) for 1 and 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. Cumulative corticosteroid dose was not associated with survival. HRadj of use of second-line immunosuppression was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.68) for PFS and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.77) for OS.
Higher corticosteroid peak dose for trAEs is associated with worse survival across tumor types, while cumulative dose is not. Too few patients received second-line immunosuppressants to confirm or reject an association with survival. These data argue for a reconsideration of irAE management approaches, starting with lower corticosteroid dose whenever feasible.
Two cohorts, one for patients with colon cancer and the second for all other patients. Of the 103 patients who completed treatment across both cohorts, 84 had a clinical complete response and 82 did not undergo surgery. Among the 117 total patients, recurrence-free survival at two years was 92%. Only 20-months follow up for now. It will be interesting to see how this goes with future updates but seems promising.
This new subcutaneous anticoagulant, abelacimab, binds to the inactive form of FXI and blocks its activation by FXII. This drug seems significantly safer than DOAC’s in terms of bleeding risk. So much so that the study was stopped early due to a greater-than-expected reduction in bleeding events in the study arm. I hope this drug is also going to be studied for the treatment of VTE.
I guess scalp cooling does have some objective evidence that it works. Still the expense and time constraints will need to be considered.
TIP will likely become the established salvage therapy for GCT’s if this study’s findings are confirmed in the ongoing Phase III TIGER trial.
Stimulant therapy with methylphenidate did not improve fatigue in a well-done, prospective, placebo-controlled trial. This refutes prior practices of using ADD medications to mitigate fatigue for patients on chemotherapy. I rarely use these in my own practice given the concern for weight loss and mood disorder.