Navigational Bronchoscopy or Transthoracic Needle Biopsy for Lung Nodules
Non-inferior in diagnosing malignant or benign lesions, and safer (less pneumothorax). The question remains about the amount of tissue for further testing.
Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer
Author(s): Patrick M. Forde, M.B., B.Ch., Jonathan Spicer, M.D., Ph.D., Shun Lu, M.D., Ph.D., Mariano Provencio, M.D., Ph.D., Tetsuya Mitsudomi, M.D., Ph.D., Mark M. Awad, M.D., Ph.D., Enriqueta Felip, M.D., Ph.D., Stephen R. Broderick, M.D., M.P.H.S., Julie R. Brahmer, M.D., Scott J. Swanson, M.D., Keith Kerr, M.B., Ch.B., Changli Wang, M.D., Ph.D., et al., for the CheckMate 816 Investigators*
Source: N Engl J Med 2022; 386:1973-1985 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2202170
This is a potential practice-changing study. Future data on overall-survival (OS) will be important to confirm results. Patient selection will also evolve over time especially in real-world practice. I presume more patients with stage II/III will get neoadjuvant therapy as opposed to a patient with a small lung nodule (stage I) taken to surgery, unless if there is significant OS for early stage patients as well.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy confers a modest benefit over surgery alone for resectable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In early-phase trials, nivolumab-based neoadjuvant regimens have shown promising clinical activity; however, data from phase 3 trials are needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS
In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC to receive nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy alone, followed by resection. The primary end points were event-free survival and pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes), both evaluated by blinded independent review. Overall survival was a key secondary end point. Safety was assessed in all treated patients.
RESULTS
The median event-free survival was 31.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.2 to not reached) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 20.8 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 26.7) with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.63; 97.38% CI, 0.43 to 0.91; P=0.005). The percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 24.0% (95% CI, 18.0 to 31.0) and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.6), respectively (odds ratio, 13.94; 99% CI, 3.49 to 55.75; P<0.001). Results for event-free survival and pathological complete response across most subgroups favored nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (99.67% CI, 0.30 to 1.07) and did not meet the criterion for significance. Of the patients who underwent randomization, 83.2% of those in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and 75.4% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group underwent surgery. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and in 36.9% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response than chemotherapy alone. The addition of nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase the incidence of adverse events or impede the feasibility of surgery.
Author Affiliations
From the Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore (P.M.F., S.R.B., J.R.B., J.M.T.); McGill University Health Center (J.S.), and Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (M.L.) — both in Montreal; Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai (S.L.), Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin (C.W.), and Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing (K.-N.C.) — all in China; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid (M.P.); Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama (T.M.), the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu (F.T.), and Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama (H.I.) — all in Japan; Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (M.M.A., S.J.S.); Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona (E.F.); Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (K.K.); Institutul Oncologic Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta and Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (T.-E.C.); Charleston Oncology, Charleston, SC (G.B.S.); University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago (E.E.V.); Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (C.D., J.C., J.F., A.J., D.B., M.S., D.P., C.Y.C.); and Institut du Thorax Curie-Montsouris, Institut Curie, Paris (N.G.).Related Articles
Plasma Proteome–Based Test for First-Line Treatment Selection in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
FCS medical oncologist and hematologist Ernesto Bustinza-Linares, MD has co-authored an abstract published in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Journal, JCO Precision Oncology, that uncovers a new testing method to determine personalized care options for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The abstract’s authors address the limitations of existing guidelines that recommend checkpoint immunotherapy, sometimes in combination with chemotherapy, for treating NSCLC, which often discounts patient variability and immune factors. The findings from the study show that by incorporating additional plasma proteome-based testing, combined with the standard protein inhibitor testing, clear differences in patient outcomes were observed after applying targeted treatments based on the testing results.
Phase II, Open-Label Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Targeted therapy in NSCLC, FCS was part of this trial.
Burden of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study from community oncology practices
FCS medical oncologist and hematologist Lowell L. Hart, MD, FACP was first-author a study with FCS co-authors President and Managing Physician Lucio N. Gordan, MD, Director of Pharmacy Operations Kristen Boykin, Senior Vice President & Data Officer Trevor Heritage, PhD, and (Retired) Vice President of Pharmacy Services Ray Bailey BPharm, RPh, that evaluated ES-SCLC patients with chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression over a seven-year period, from January 2013 through December 2020. Within this cohort, 98% of the patients experienced at least one myelosuppressive episode following chemotherapy treatment, leading to the need for supportive care, creating additional costs in health care management and time lost in treatment for ES-SCLC.
Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study
Suddenly met-NSCLC is a crowded space. This study did not conclude that T+D+CT was better than D+CT, the findings showed that D+CT was better than CT alone. The addition of T to D+CT improved the PFS and OS trend but I don’t think this was a homerun result. There was not a significant OS benefit and further follow-up will declare these results. Also an improved outcomes were not seen in the non-squamous population. The pembrolizumab studies have 5+ years of follow-up and an improvement in PFS and OS across NSCLC subtypes.