I guess scalp cooling does have some objective evidence that it works. Still the expense and time constraints will need to be considered.
Current studies of the efficacy of scalp cooling are limited by short-term duration. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of scalp cooling in reducing persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (PCIA) 6 months after chemotherapy.
We conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial comparing scalp cooling versus control in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer stages I-III scheduled to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent between December 2020 and August 2021. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to scalp cooling or usual clinical practice. The primary outcome was PCIA 6 months after chemotherapy. Hair thickness and density were measured using Folliscope 5.0. CIA-related distress was assessed using the CIA distress scale (CADS), with a higher score reflecting higher stress.
The proportion of patients with PCIA at 6 months was 13.5% (12/89) in the scalp-cooling group and 52.0% (26/50) in the control group. The average difference in the change in hair thickness from baseline between the scalp-cooling and control groups was 9.0 μm in favor of the intervention group. The average difference in the change in hair density between intervention and control at the end of the study was –3.3 hairs/cm2. At 6 months after chemotherapy, the average difference in the change in CADS score between the intervention and control groups was –3.2 points, reflecting reduced CIA-related stress in the intervention group.
Scalp cooling reduced the incidence of PCIA, primarily by increasing hair thickness compared with control. Scalp cooling is helpful in promoting qualitative hair regrowth. Yet, further research is necessary to observe longer-term benefits of scalp cooling.
This new subcutaneous anticoagulant, abelacimab, binds to the inactive form of FXI and blocks its activation by FXII. This drug seems significantly safer than DOAC’s in terms of bleeding risk. So much so that the study was stopped early due to a greater-than-expected reduction in bleeding events in the study arm. I hope this drug is also going to be studied for the treatment of VTE.
Pooled data of nearly 2000 patients across six trials in melanoma using IO therapy. It seems clear that high dose corticosteroid use was associated with worse outcomes, especially with high peak doses. What may be worth considering is if non-steroid based immunosuppression can be used as an adjunct to blunt this concerning effect.
TIP will likely become the established salvage therapy for GCT’s if this study’s findings are confirmed in the ongoing Phase III TIGER trial.
Stimulant therapy with methylphenidate did not improve fatigue in a well-done, prospective, placebo-controlled trial. This refutes prior practices of using ADD medications to mitigate fatigue for patients on chemotherapy. I rarely use these in my own practice given the concern for weight loss and mood disorder.
Pooled data across 10 studies of Zanubritinib show that tolerability is better with Zanubritinib compared to Ibrutinib. There is little reason to use ibrutinib in newly diagnosed patients in my opinion.
FCS Hematology Oncology Review creates a platform for our physician network to observe the most recent articles and studies available in the oncology and hematology world. By sharing these articles we are building our wealth of knowledge of new observations and treatments as they come available.
